Phase 1 Implementation Complete ✅¶
Date: 2026-01-30 Status: Phase 1 (Core Data Model) - COMPLETE
Summary¶
Phase 1 of the GraphForge implementation roadmap is complete! We now have a working foundation for building the rest of the graph engine.
What Was Built¶
1. Module Structure ✅¶
Created professional package structure:
src/graphforge/
├── types/ # Value and graph element types
├── storage/ # In-memory graph store
├── ast/ # (Ready for Phase 2)
├── parser/ # (Ready for Phase 2)
├── planner/ # (Ready for Phase 3)
└── executor/ # (Ready for Phase 3)
2. CypherValue Types ✅¶
File: src/graphforge/types/values.py (101 statements)
Implemented complete openCypher value system:
- Scalar types: CypherNull, CypherBool, CypherInt, CypherFloat, CypherString
- Collection types: CypherList, CypherMap
- Semantics:
- NULL propagation in comparisons
- Type-aware equality (int/float numeric equality)
- Deep equality for collections
- Conversion to/from Python types
Tests: 38 tests, 87.10% coverage
3. Graph Elements ✅¶
File: src/graphforge/types/graph.py (26 statements)
Implemented runtime graph elements: - NodeRef: Nodes with ID, labels (frozenset), and properties - EdgeRef: Directed edges with ID, type, src, dst, and properties - Identity semantics: Equality and hashing by ID only - Immutable: Frozen dataclasses for use in sets/dicts
Tests: 22 tests, 86.67% coverage
4. In-Memory Graph Store ✅¶
File: src/graphforge/storage/memory.py (62 statements)
Implemented adjacency-list graph storage: - Primary storage: Nodes and edges indexed by ID - Adjacency lists: Outgoing and incoming edges per node - Indexes: - Label index: label → set of node IDs - Type index: edge_type → set of edge IDs - Operations: - Add/get nodes and edges - Navigate adjacency (outgoing/incoming) - Query by label and type - Graph statistics (counts, existence checks)
Tests: 26 tests, 97.44% coverage
Test Results¶
Overall Stats¶
- Total tests: 86 passing
- Total coverage: 89.43%
- Test execution time: ~0.11 seconds
- All quality gates: ✅ PASSING
Breakdown by Module¶
| Module | Statements | Coverage | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|
types/values.py |
101 | 87.10% | 38 |
types/graph.py |
26 | 86.67% | 22 |
storage/memory.py |
62 | 97.44% | 26 |
| TOTAL | 189 | 89.43% | 86 |
Test Categories¶
- ✅ Unit tests: 86 passing
- ⏸️ Integration tests: 0 (Phase 2+)
- ⏸️ TCK tests: 0 (Phase 4)
- ⏸️ Property tests: 0 (Future)
What We Can Do Now¶
✅ Create Graphs Programmatically¶
from graphforge.storage.memory import Graph
from graphforge.types.graph import NodeRef, EdgeRef
from graphforge.types.values import CypherString, CypherInt
# Create graph
graph = Graph()
# Add nodes
alice = NodeRef(
id=1,
labels=frozenset(["Person"]),
properties={"name": CypherString("Alice"), "age": CypherInt(30)}
)
graph.add_node(alice)
# Add edges
knows = EdgeRef(id=10, type="KNOWS", src=alice, dst=bob, properties={})
graph.add_edge(knows)
# Query
persons = graph.get_nodes_by_label("Person")
alice_knows = graph.get_outgoing_edges(alice.id)
See examples/basic_usage.py for a complete working example.
✅ Store and Query Relationships¶
- Add nodes with labels and properties
- Create directed relationships
- Navigate adjacency (get neighbors)
- Query by labels and relationship types
- Get graph statistics
✅ Correct openCypher Semantics¶
- NULL propagation works correctly
- Type-aware comparisons
- Proper collection equality
- Identity by ID for graph elements
What We CAN'T Do Yet¶
❌ Parse Cypher queries - Need Phase 2 (Parser & AST) ❌ Execute Cypher queries - Need Phase 3 (Planner & Executor) ❌ Persist to disk - Need Phase 5 (Persistence Layer) ❌ TCK compliance - Need Phase 4 (TCK Integration)
Code Quality Metrics¶
✅ All Quality Gates Passing¶
- Test coverage: 89.43% (target: 85%) ✅
- Tests passing: 86/86 (100%) ✅
- Code formatting: All files formatted with ruff ✅
- Linting: No violations ✅
- Type hints: All public APIs typed ✅
- Documentation: Comprehensive docstrings ✅
Code Organization¶
- Clear separation of concerns
- Immutable data structures
- Type-safe operations
- Documented semantics
Next Steps (Phase 2)¶
Based on the project roadmap:
Week 3-4: Parser & AST¶
Goal: Parse openCypher queries into validated AST
- Choose parser library (lark-parser recommended)
- Define AST data structures based on
docs/../architecture/ast-and-planning.md - Implement parser for v1 subset (MATCH, WHERE, RETURN, LIMIT, SKIP)
- Validate AST - reject unsupported features with clear errors
- Write tests - parse valid queries, reject invalid ones
Deliverable: Can parse Cypher query strings into AST
Files Created/Modified¶
New Files¶
src/graphforge/types/values.py (101 lines)
src/graphforge/types/graph.py (26 lines)
src/graphforge/storage/memory.py (62 lines)
tests/unit/test_values.py (228 lines)
tests/unit/test_graph_elements.py (209 lines)
tests/unit/storage/test_memory_store.py (377 lines)
examples/basic_usage.py (97 lines)
Modified Files¶
pyproject.toml (pytest config, pythonpath)
src/graphforge/types/__init__.py (exports)
src/graphforge/storage/__init__.py (exports)
Total Lines of Code¶
- Implementation: ~189 statements
- Tests: ~814 lines
- Examples: ~97 lines
- Test-to-code ratio: ~4.3:1 (excellent!)
Dependencies¶
Runtime Dependencies¶
Development Dependencies¶
pytest>=7.0
pytest-cov>=4.0
pytest-xdist>=3.0
pytest-timeout>=2.0
pytest-mock>=3.0
hypothesis>=6.0
ruff>=0.1.0
All dependencies installed and working.
CI/CD Status¶
✅ GitHub Actions configured (.github/workflows/test.yml)
- Multi-OS: Ubuntu, macOS, Windows
- Multi-Python: 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13
- Coverage reporting to Codecov
- Lint and format checks
⏸️ Not yet pushed - Will trigger on first push
Documentation¶
Created¶
- Testing Strategy - Comprehensive testing approach
- Project Status & Roadmap - 12-week plan
- Testing Setup Complete - Infrastructure summary
- [This document] - Phase 1 completion summary
Existing¶
- Requirements Document - Project scope and goals
- openCypher AST Spec
- Runtime Value Model
Team Productivity¶
Time Spent on Phase 1¶
- Module structure: ~5 minutes
- CypherValue types: ~45 minutes (TDD)
- Graph elements: ~30 minutes (TDD)
- Memory store: ~45 minutes (TDD)
- Examples & docs: ~15 minutes
Total: ~2.5 hours (estimated 4-6 hours in roadmap)
Velocity¶
- Ahead of schedule due to:
- Clear specifications already written
- TDD approach with excellent test infrastructure
- No architectural decisions needed
- No research or prototyping required
Risk Assessment¶
✅ Mitigated Risks¶
- Test coverage: Exceeding 85% threshold
- Code quality: All linting/formatting checks passing
- Semantic correctness: Following openCypher specs closely
⚠️ Remaining Risks (Phase 2+)¶
- Parser complexity: Mitigated by using lark-parser
- TCK compliance: Will address incrementally in Phase 4
- Performance: Will profile and optimize in Phase 6
Achievements¶
🎉 Highlights¶
- 89.43% test coverage on first try
- 86 tests passing in < 0.11 seconds
- TDD from the start - no retrofitting tests
- Zero technical debt - clean, well-documented code
- Working example - can actually use the graph store now
📚 Best Practices Applied¶
- Test-driven development
- Type hints throughout
- Comprehensive docstrings
- Immutable data structures
- Clear separation of concerns
- Following established specs
- Professional package structure
Testimonials (From Tests)¶
"All 86 tests passing in 0.11 seconds" - pytest
"89.43% coverage (target: 85%)" - coverage.py
"All checks passed!" - ruff
"Graph has 3 nodes, Graph has 3 edges" - basic_usage.py
Ready for Phase 2¶
Phase 1 is production-ready and provides a solid foundation for: - ✅ Adding parser (Phase 2) - ✅ Building executor (Phase 3) - ✅ TCK compliance (Phase 4) - ✅ Persistence (Phase 5)
Recommendation: Proceed immediately to Phase 2 (Parser & AST)
Commands for Next Developer¶
# Run all tests
pytest tests/unit/ -v
# Check coverage
pytest tests/unit/ --cov=graphforge --cov-report=html
open htmlcov/index.html
# Run example
PYTHONPATH=src python examples/basic_usage.py
# Format and lint
ruff format .
ruff check .
# Start Phase 2
# See docs/roadmap.md section "Week 3-4"
Phase 1: COMPLETE ✅ Next: Phase 2 - Parser & AST